Supreme Court of India
Indrakunwar v. The State of Chhattisgarh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: Whether, in explaining the purported incriminating circumstance against her, the convict-appellant ought to have disclosed, over and above denial of any relationship with the deceas ed child, the specifi cs of her miscarriage and its aftermath; particularly when the prosecution has failed to discharge its burden of es tablishing such relationship between the deceased and the convict -appellant. Constitution of India – Right to Privacy – Personal life of a woman accused of committing a crime – Failure of Prosecution to disch arge its duty: Held: The essence of a woman’s
Authorities it was built on
- 2017 Justice K S Puttaswamy (retd.), and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- 2009 Suchita Srivastava & Anr. v. Chandigarh Administration
- 2010 S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal and Anr.
- 2018 Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and Others
- 2012 Brajendrasingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2019 Shailendra Rajdev Pasvan and Others v. State of Gujarat Etc.
- 2022 Munikrishna @ Krishna Etc. v. State by Ulsoor Ps
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.