Supreme Court of India
Hanumant v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal trial-Circumstantial evidence-Sufficiency of evid ence for conviction-Caution against basing conviction on guess or suspicion-Admission-Must be taken as a whole. In dealing with circumstantial evidenee there is always the danger that conjecture or suspicion may take the place of legal proof. It is therefore right to remember that in cases where the evidence is of a circumstantal nature, the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should in the first instance be fully established and all the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Nilesh Baburao Gitte v. State of Maharashtra
- 2025 Neelam Kumari v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2025 Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamilnadu
- 2025 Raja Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh
- 2025 Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2025 Abdul Nassar v. State of Kerala & Anr.
- 2024 Santosh @ Rajesh @ Gopal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2024 Raju and Another v. State of Uttarakhand
- 2023 Jabir & Ors v. The State of Uttarakhand
Of those, 9 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.