Supreme Court of India
Fainul Khan v. State of Jharkhand and Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above discussion we regret our inability to consider the alternative submission of Shri Luthra.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss.302/149 and ss.323/149 and s.1 47 – Conviction under – Plea of appellant that charge was framed unde r ss.302/149 and ss.323/149 against six persons but c harge under s.147 was against four persons only and therefore w as defective without aid of s.141 and s.146 – Held: Originally th ere were six accused – Two of them have since been deceased – Appellant s were well aware that six of them were charged together f or a common assault under ss.302/149 and 323/149 because of their sharing a common object – Appellants were also aware that two of the accused were carrying a
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Ghanshyam Mandal v. The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
- 2022 The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Subhash @ Pappu
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.