Legal Street registered trademark

Supreme Court of India

Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2012] 12 S.C.R. 327
Bench S.H. Kapadia, D.K. Jain, Surinder Singh Nijjar, Ranjana Prakash Desai and Jagdish Singh Khehar JJ.
Decided 6 September 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

27 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the contested language in Article V(1)(e) of the Convention

Judgment, page 116

From the headnote

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996- ss.2(2) and 9; Part I and Part II - Interpretation of s. 2(2) - Scope of the provisions of Part I and Part II of the Act- Territoriality principle - Whether s. 2(2) bars application of Part I of the Act to Arbitrations which take place outside India - Grant of interim measures by Indian Courts where seat of arbitration is outside India - Maintainability of inter-parte suit for interim relief - Held: The Act has accepted the territoriality principle which has been adopted in the UNCITRAL Model Law - s.2(2) makes declaration that Part I of the Act shall

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 6 relied on · 5 followed · 15 referred to · 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.