Supreme Court of India
M/s. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. M/s. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the order of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 nominating an arbitrator is not an adjudicatory order and the Chief Justice or his designate is not a tribunal.
Judgment, page 22
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section I I-Order passed by Chief Justice or his designate nominating an Arbitrator-Held not adjudicatory in nature-Such an order held not amenable to jurisdiction of Supreme Court under Article 136-UNCJTRAL Model Law held not a guide to interpretation of Act. The apvointment of Arbitratbrs by the Chief Justice of India Scheme, 1996: Clause 7-Requirement of giving notice upon other party to arbitration to show cause why nomination of arbitrator should not be made-Held bad- Amendment suggested. Constitution of India, 1950: Article 136 Special Leave
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 International Amusement Limited v. India Trade Promotion Organisation &anr.
- 2025 Asf Buildtech Private Limited v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited
- 2024 Sbi General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning
- 2023 M/s N. N. Global Mercantile Private Limited v. M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors.
- 2020 Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
- 2019 Zenith Drugs & Allied Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director, Shri Uday Krishna Paul v. M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.
- 2019 Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.
- 2013 Arasmeta Captive Power Company Private Limited and Another v. Lafarge India Private Limited
- 2012 Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 followed · 7 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.