Supreme Court of India
Eitzen Bulk A/s v. Ashapura Mlnechem Ltd. & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -Part I -Foreign award, where arbitration is not held in India and is governed by foreign law - Enforcement -Application of Part I of the Act to the Foreign award - Held: Where the parties choose a juridical seat of Arbitration outside India and provide that the law which governs Arbitration would be a lmv other than Indian lmv Part I of the Act would not have any application - Mere choosing of the juridical seat of Arbitration attracts the law applicable to such, location - It would not be necessary to specify which law would apply to the Arbitration
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited
- 2018 Union of India v. Hardy Exploration and Production (india) Inc
- 2017 Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited v. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.