Supreme Court of India
Delhi Development Authority v. Virender Lal Bahri & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. 24 Proviso – Whether the proviso governs s. 24(1)(b) or s. 24(2) – Held: The proviso governs s. 24(1)(b) and not s. 24 (2) – However the question is referred to larger Bench. Referring the matter to larger Bench, the Court HELD: 1. Section 24(1) and (2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitatio n and Resettlement Act, 2013 deal with different subjects . Section 24(1) deals with compensation whereas Section 24(2) deals wit h lapsing of the
Authorities it was built on
- 1985 S. Sundaram Pillai, Etc. v. V.R. Pattabiraman Etc.
- 1988 Hindustan Thompson Associates Ltd. v. Mrs. Maya Inderson Israni & Ors.
- 2017 Ms. Eera through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- 1975 Dwarka Prasad v. Dwarka Das Saraf
- 2014 Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- 1996 J.K. Industries Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. The Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- 2018 Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra (dead) through Lrs. & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.