Supreme Court of India

Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1
Bench Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud JJ.
Decided 19 April 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the above reasons, we have come to the conclusion th at there is absolutely no merit in the writ petitions.

Judgment, page 104

From the headnote

Constitution of India – Art.32 – Judge Loya death c ase – Writ petitions seeking inquiry into the circumstances of the death of the Judge who was presiding over the criminal trial where in one of the accused was the National President of the Bhara tiya Janata Party (then Minister of State for Home in the State of Gujarat)– Petitions based on two articles published in the “Caravan” magazine raising suspicion about unnatural death of the Judge as opposed to his natural death due to heart attack – Petition ers inter alia questioned the conduct of the colleagues of the Judge in at tending to him

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 3 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.