Supreme Court of India
Kavalappara Kottarathil Kochunni Moopil Nayar v. The State of Madras and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Fundamental Rights, Enforcement of-Maintainability of petition-Powers a.11-d jurisdiction of Supreute Court-Extcnt-Con siiiution of India, Art. 32. The petitioner in Petition No. L!J was the Moopil Nair of the Kavalappara sthanam and, as the sthanee, claimed to be the sole proprietor of the sthanam properties. The respondents Nos. 2 to rJ, who were the junior members of the Kavalappara tarwad or family, resisted the claim on the ground that the pro perties were tarward properties and they had rights in them. There was litigation between the parties and ultimately the Privy Council held in
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Ritu Chhabaria v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2018 Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.
- 2012 Subhash Popatlal Dave v. Union of India and Anr.
- 2013 People's Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
Of those, 1 followed · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.