Supreme Court of India
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Bail: FIR against appellant (accused) u/ss. 419, 420, 406 and 506 IPC and complaint u/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act – Duri ng investigation, appellant not arrested – While reject ing his petition for quashing the FIR, High Court granted two months time to ap pear before trial judge – Once again High Court granted him further two months time to appear before trial Judge – Ther eafter, on appellant’s appearing before trial judge, taken into judici al custody – Bail applications rejected by trial court as well as High Court – On appeal, held: An important facet of criminal jur isprudence
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2020 Preet Pal Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 2019 Mauji Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 2022 Deepak Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr
- 2018 Seema Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
Of those, 3 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.