Supreme Court of India
Ms. X v. The State of Telangana and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the order of the High Court allowing the application for bail cannot be faulted.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Bail: Regular bail – u/s. 439 CrPC.- Granted in a case involvi ng offences u/ss. 376, 342, 493, 506 and 354( ) of IPC – Cancellatio n of – Held: There is no cogent material to indicate that the accused had been guilty of conduct which would warrant his being deprived of his liberty – No supervening circumstance made out to warrant cancellation of bail – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 439. On the complaint of the appellant against responden t- accused, charge-sheet was filed for offences punishable u /ss. 376, 343, 493, 506 and 354( ) of IPC. Accused was grante d anticipatory bail,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Puran Mal v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- 2021 Vipan Kumar Dhir v. State of Punjab and Another
- 2026 Shuvendu Saha v. The State of West Bengal and Anr.
- 2023 Bhagwan Singh v. Dilip Kumar @ Deepu @ Depak and Another
- 2022 Centrum Financial Services Limited v. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.