Supreme Court of India
Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.437, 439 – Ba il – Nature of conditions imposed – Right to travel abroa d – FIR lodged against appellant in 2014 alleging forgery – Appellant eventually arrested in 2020 – High Court granted conditional in terim bail to the appellant for eight weeks – However, declined t o relax the conditions imposed to permit him to visit the US – Held: Conditions which a court imposes for the grant of bail have to balance the public interest in the enforcement of criminal justice with th e rights of the accused – Conditions imposed must bear a proportional r
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh v. Bihar Legislative Council (through Secretary) and Ors.
- 2024 Sudeep Chatterjee v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- 2022 Mohammed Zubair v. State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
- 2021 Kumer Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Anr
- 2021 Aparna Bhat & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.