Supreme Court of India

Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.

Neutral citation

Reported as [2013] 13 S.C.R. 764

Bench T.S. Thakur and Madan B. Lokur JJ.

Decided 10 July 2013

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: ss. 2(k), 7A and 20 - Prosecution of accused u/ss. 147, 302, 3048 and 498A /PC - During trial, accused raised plea of juvenifity underJuvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Plea rejected, finding him to be above 16 years of age - After trial, convicted uls. 3048 and 498A and sentenced to 7 years and 2 years imprisonment respectively with fine of Rs. 1001- - Conviction and sentence confirmed in High Court - In appeal to this Court, accused took plea of juvenility under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 - On direction of Supreme Court trial court's

Authorities it was built on

1996 D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal cited by 41
2012 Abuzar Hossain @ Gulam Hossain v. State of West Bengal cited by 21
2005 Pratap Singh v. State of Jharkhand and Anr. cited by 20
2009 Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. cited by 17
2013 Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra cited by 12
2012 Ashwani Kumar Saxena v. State of M.P. cited by 11
1997 Bhola Bhagat Etc. v. State of Bihar cited by 6
2005 Gurpreet Singh v. State of Punjab cited by 6
2005 Bijender Singh v. State of Haryana and Anr. cited by 5
2009 Pawan v. State of Uttaranchal cited by 5
2011 Daya Nand v. State of Haryana cited by 5
2012 Vijay Singh v. State of Delhi cited by 1
2009 Satish @ Dhanna v. State of M.P. & Ors. cited by 1

Where later benches applied it

2021 Devilal and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh relied on
2020 Satya Deo @ Bhoorey v. State of Uttar Pradesh relied on
2023 Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary v. The State of Maharashtra referred to

Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.