Supreme Court of India

Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra

Neutral citation
Reported as [2013] 8 S.C.R. 863
Bench T.S. Thakur and Gyan Sudha Misra JJ.
Decided 3 May 2013

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

12 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the considered opinion that it is an obligation of the sentencing court to consider all relevant facts and C circumstances bearing on the question of sentence and impose a sentence commensurate with the gravity of the offence ... xx xx xx xx ... To say the least, the order contains no reasons, much less "special or adequate reasons".

Judgment, page 45

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860 - s.300 Exception 4 ands. 304 (Part II) - Trial and conviction uls. 302134 by courts below - Held: The nature of injury inflicted by accused, the part of body on which inflicted, weapons of offence and circumstances in which injury was inflicted, do not suggest that the accused had the intention to kill the deceased - Therefore, accused entitled to benefit of Exception 4 to s.300 - The case would fall uls. 304 (Part II) - Conviction altered to one u/s. 304 (Part II) and sentence reduced to 5 years RI. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.357 - Compensation to the victim -

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.