Supreme Court of India
Daya Nand v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: s.2(k), 2(1), 7- , 20 and 49- Determination ofjuvenility - Held: All persons below the age of 18 years on the date of c commission of offence would be treated as juveniles, even if ,- the claim of juvenility is raised after they have attained the age of 18 years on or before the date of commencement of the 2000 Act and were undergoing sentence upon being convicted - Accordingly, a juvenile who has not completed . 18 years on the date of commission of the offence is entitled to the benefits of the 2000 Act, as if the provisions of
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Bharat Bhushan v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2019 Raju v. The State of Haryana
- 2013 Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- 2012 Abuzar Hossain @ Gulam Hossain v. State of West Bengal
- 2012 Ashwani Kumar Saxena v. State of M.P.
Of those, 1 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.