Supreme Court of India

Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar & Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2013] 7 S.C.R. 420
Bench T.S. Thakur and Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla JJ.
Decided 4 July 2013

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that on a parity of reasoning and looking to the consequences of denial of opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, we would prefer to err in favour of the appellant getting an opportunity rather than protecting the prosecution against a possible prejudice at his cost.

Judgment, page 17

From the headnote

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s.311 - Power of court to re-examine a witness - Principles to be followed while dealing with an application u/s 311 - Culled out - Held: In the instant case, the application of complainant for his re-examination has no bona tides -- Trial 0 court had the opportunity to observe the demeanour of complainant while tendering evidence which persuaded it to reach the conclusion and that deserves .more credence while examining the correctness of the order passed by it - Order of trial court did not call for any interference, in any event, behind the back of

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.