Supreme Court of India
Jumman Khan v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that this submission made on behalf of the petitioner does not merit consideration.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 302-Murder--Death sentence Constitutional validity of. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: Sections 235(2)-Sentence Pre-tf.ecisional opportunity of hearing to accused-Statutory mandate Not a mere formality strict compliance required. Sections 368, 413, 414 and 415-Sentence of death-Whether open to review-Undue delay in execution-Subsequent supervening circumstances warranting interference. Constitution of India, 1950: Article 21: Capital punishment Constitutional validity of. Practice & Procedure: New plea-raising of-For the first time Permissibility of. The
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
- 2013 Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra
- 2023 Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
- 2019 R. Jayapal v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
- 2013 Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.