Supreme Court of India

P. Sanjeeva Rao v. The State of A.P.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2012] 6 S.C.R. 787
Bench T.S. Thakur and Gyan Sudha Misra JJ.
Decided 2 July 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that on a parity of reasoning and looking to the consequences of denial of opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, we would prefer to err in favour of the appellant getting an opportunity rather than protecting the prosecution D against a possible prejudice at his cost.

Judgment, page 16

From the headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss. 311 and 242 - Extent and scope of the power of the Court to recall witnesses - Prosecution for offences punishable u/ss. 7 and 13(1) rlw 13(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act - Around the time the prosecution concluded its evidence, accused-appellant filed petition u/ss. 242 and 311 CrPC for recall of PW 1- complainant and PW2 (an independent witness) for cross­ examination - Plea of appellant that cross-examination of PWs 1 and 2 had been deferred till such time the Trap Laying Officer (PW 11) was examined by the prosecution and since the said

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 4 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.