Supreme Court of India

Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya v. State of Rajasthan

Neutral citation
Reported as [2013] 8 S.C.R. 599
Bench Dr. B.S. Chauhan and Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla JJ.
Decided 6 May 2013
Status Distinguished

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860 - ss.302, 376 and 201 - Prosecution under - For murder and rape of 4 years old girl - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction by Courts below - On appeal, held: Prosecution evidence is shaky and chain of links ·connecting the accused with the crime is inconclusive - Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond_reasonable doubt - Accused entitled to benefit of doubt - Hence o acquitted. Evidence: Circumstantial evidence - In a case of circumstantial evidence, judgment remains essentially inferential, drawn from the established facts as the circumstances lead to - Hence, all the

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned · 1 not applicable

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.