Supreme Court of India
Ashish Batham v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-Section 302 and 449--Murder and house trespass to commit murder--Conviclion based on circumstantial evidence--Concurrenl findings. bf court be/ow--Sustainability--On appeal held, evidence relied on for substantialing circumstances suffered from serious infirmities and lack of legal credibilities to merit acceptance-Also does not lend continuity lo chain of even/s resulting in murder-Hence conviclion sel aside. Appellant-accused committed house trespass and murder of two girls. Trial Court relied on circumstantial evidence that appellant-accused failed in love affair with the
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya v. State of Rajasthan
- 2022 Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2017 S. Subbulaxmi v. Kumarasamy & Ors.
- 2016 U. Subhadramma & Ors. v. State of A.P. Rep. by Pub. Prosecutor & Anr.
- 2013 Laxmibai (dead) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. v. Bhagwantbuva (dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- 2009 Rathinam @ Rathinan v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- 2010 Santosh Kumar Singh v. State Thr. Cbi
Of those, 1 relied on · 5 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.