Supreme Court of India
Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Others v. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986: Sections 12, 13 and 14 - Power of review and to set aside ex parte orders - Held: District Consumer Forums and State Commissions have not been given any power to set aside ex parte orders and power of review and the powers which have c not been expressly given by the statute cannot be exercised. 0 Section 22 (as amended in 2002) read with ss. 12, 13 and 14 ands. 22- (as introduced in 2002) - Power and procedure applicable to National Commission and power to set aside ex parte orders - Held: After amendment in s. 22 and introduction of s. 22- , the power of
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Torrent Power Limited v. U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors
- 2021 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Ankita Sinha & Ors.
- 2012 Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.