Supreme Court of India
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Copyright Act, 1957 - s. 31(1)(b)- Powers under- Scope of - Power of Copyright Board - To pass ad interim order- In a pending complaint u/s. 31 - Held: Section 31 contemplates final relief - The statute does not vest the Copyright Board power to grant interim order - To grant interim compulsory licence during the pendency of the complaint would amount to final relief at the interim stage. The question for consideration in the present appeals was whether on a complaint made to the Copyright Board uls. 31 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the said Board under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) can pass an
Authorities it was built on
- 2006 M/s Transcore v. Union of India and Anr.
- 2008 M/s Entertainment Network (india) Ltd. v. M/s Super Cassette Industries Ltd.
- 1994 Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartick Das
- 1999 The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. v. Grapco Industries Ltd. and Ors.
- 1968 Income Tax Officer v. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi
- 2011 Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Others v. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Another
- 1999 Allahabad Bank, Calcutta v. Radha Krishna Maity and Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.