Supreme Court of India
A Shankar v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss.302 and 307, 324 - Charge-sheet filed ulss.302, 307 against appellant-accused - Acquittal by trial court on the ground that prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had committed murder of the brother of the complainant or made an attempt to kill the complainant - Appeal against acquittal - Conviction by High Court u/ss.302 and 324 - Justification of- Held: Not justified - Contradiction between the statement of the complainant made in the court as compared to his statement before the police regarding the weapon. of crime demolished the
Authorities it was built on
- 2010 Dr. Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- 2010 Vijay @ Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2010 Brahm Swaroop & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- 2008 State Rep. by Inspector of Police v. Saravanan & Anr.
- 2009 Mahendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P.
- 2008 Arumugam v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dal Singh & Ors.
- 2021 Mohan @srinivas @seena @tailor Seena v. The State of Karnataka
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.