Supreme Court of India
Mohan @srinivas @seena @tailor Seena v. The State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.378, 384 – Ap peal against acquittal – Murder of police officer – Appellan ts acquitted giving benefit of doubt – Acquittal reversed by High Court – On appeal, held: Most of the witnesses turned hostile – PW1-Sub Inspector of Police, the sterling witness of the pr osecution had an axe to grind against the accused who had given a complaint again st him – It is too strange that he could be a chance witne ss – Many contradictions in statements made by PW-1 and PW-2-Duty constable – Alleged occurrence was said to have happened at ab out 5 p.m. on a busy road
Authorities it was built on
- 2007 Chandrappa and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- 2009 Arulvelu and Another v. State Represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another
- 1998 Sambasivan and Ors. v. State of Kerala
- 1999 Paparambaka Rosamma and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 1977 Umedbhai Jadavbhai v. The State of Gujarat
- 1999 K. Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala
- 2011 Surinder Kumar v. State of Haryana
- 2011 A Shankar v. State of Karnataka
- 1977 Rajendra Prasad v. State of Bihar
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.