Legal Street registered trademark

Supreme Court of India

Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 5 S.C.R. 162
Bench Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and J. B. Pardiwala JJ.
Decided 13 October 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the disclosure statement made by the accused-appellants (Exts.

Judgment, page 43

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860: s.302 – Prosecution case was that on fateful day, appellant-accused murdered his wife and fou r children with a sharp cutting weapon while they were sleepin g – Motive behind the murder was attributed to extra marital affair of ap pellant with one married lady which was highly opposed by the dece ased- wife – Discovery statement made by appellant and co nsequently recovery made – Appellant said to have made extra j udicial confession to prosecution witness – Trial court con victed the appellant and passed death sentence – High Court co nfirmed the death sentence – Hence

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 3 referred to · 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.