Supreme Court of India
H.R. Adyanthaya v. Sandoz (india) Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the complaint filed by the workmen is not maintainable under the Maharashtra Act, we are of the view that taking into consideration the fact that a long time has lapsed since thy filing of H the complaint, it is necessary that we exercise our powers under Article H.R.ADYANTIIAYAv.
Judgment, page 24
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 M/s Bharti Airtel Limited v. A.S. Raghavendra
- 2016 Raj Kumar v. Director of Education & Ors.
- 2015 Chauharya Tripathi & Ors. v. L.L.C. of India & Ors.
- 2006 Muir Mills Unit of N.T.C. (u.p) Ltd. v. Swayam Prakash Srivastava and Anr.
- 2005 Management of M/s. Sonepat Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Ajit Singh
- 2004 Mukesh K. Tripathi v. Sr. Divisional Manager, Lic and Ors.
- 2001 Bharat Bhawan Trust v. Bharat Bhawan Artists Association and Anr.
Of those, 7 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.