Supreme Court of India
State (cbi) v. Mohd. Salim Zargar @ Fayaz & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that adequate time had [2025] 4 S.C.R. 179 State (CBI) v.
Judgment, page 23
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the correctness of judgment and order of the Special Court acquitting the respondents for offences under Ranbir Penal Code, 1932 and Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. Headnotes† Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 – ss.3, 4, 15, 19 – TADA Rules – r.15 – Recording of confessional statement – Non-compliance – Effect – Complaint alleging that Vice Chancellor of Kashmir University and his Personal Secretary were kidnapped by armed terrorists from their official car and subsequently, their dead bodies
Authorities it was built on
- 1994 Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
- 2009 Ahmed Hussein Vali Mohammed Saiyed & Anr. v. State of Gujarat
- 2013 Ravinder Singh v. Sukhbir Singh & Ors.
- 2000 S.N. Dube Etc. v. N.B. Bhoir
- 1996 Sharafa Thussain Abdulrahaman Shaikh and Ors. v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- 2020 Raja @ Ayyappan v. State of Tamil Nadu
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.