Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether High Court was justified in quashing the FIR registered against the Respondent in the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of FIR under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; whether a composite order can be passed under Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 directing registration of FIR and conducting investigation in the case. Headnotes† Requirement of preliminary inquiry before directing registration of an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act: Held: Conducting a preliminary inquiry is not sine qua non
Authorities it was built on
- 1990 State of Haryana and Ors v. Ch. Bhajan Lal and Ors.
- 2013 Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors.
- 1970 P. Sirajuddin Etc. v. State of Madras Etc.
- 2000 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shri Ram Singh
- 2021 Bureau of Investigation (cbi) and Anr. v. Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T. H. Vijayalakshmi and Anr.
- 2019 The State of Telangana v. Sri Managipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
- 2023 Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri and Others
- 2008 Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayuktha and Anr v. B. Srinivas
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.