Supreme Court of India
Jay Kishan and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons aforesaid, the FIR namely CC No.0092/2023 stands quashed.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. FIR against the appellants, if ought to be quashed. Headnotes† Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 – ss.2, 3 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.420/406/120B/504/395/427/506 – Constitution of India – Article 21 – The allegations in the Criminal Cases (CCs) cited in the FIR to invoke the Gangsters Act against the appellants were
Authorities it was built on
- 2005 Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Etc.
- 1954 Tolaram Relumal and Another v. The State of Bombay
- 2023 Mohammad Wajid and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- 2024 Md. Rahim Ali @ Abdur Rahim v. The State of Assam & Ors.
- 2024 Prem Raj v. Poonamma Menon & Anr.
- 2022 Shraddha Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.