Supreme Court of India
Shraddha Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above discussion and for the reasons stat ed above, the High Court has rightly refused to quash the criminal proceedings against the appellant-accused under Sections 2/3 of the Gangsters Act, 1986, in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 – ss. 2 & 3 – case u/s 147, 304, 504, 323, 506, 120 - IPC was registered against the six accused persons – On further investigation and on the basis of the call recordings between the co-accused, the names of the appellant was added as accused in the case – Thereafter, a gang chart was prepared ag ainst the appellant and sections 2/3 of the Gangsters Act has been lodged/ registered against the appellant – The appellant ap proached the High Court u/s 482 of CrPC to quash the order and the FIR registered against her u/s
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Lal Mohd. & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2025 Jay Kishan and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.