Supreme Court of India
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramjan Khan & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the conviction of the respondents-accused under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC. Headnotes† Evidence – Dying declaration, allegedly made to a close relative – Reliance upon – When not proper – Respondents were convicted inter alia relying on the dying declaration allegedly made to the mother of the deceased (PW-8) – Conviction set aside by High Court – Correctness: Held: Oral dying declaration should be of such a nature as to inspire full confidence of the Court in its correctness – Dying declaration is not a
Authorities it was built on
- 2013 Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors.
- 2003 Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. and Ors. v. Tapan Kr. Singh
- 2011 State of U.P. v. Naresh and Ors.
- 1993 Anil Phukan v. State of Assam
- 1972 Dharma Rama Bhagare v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2012 Govindaraju@ Govinda v. State by Sriramapuram P.S. & Anr.
- 2003 Jai Karan and Ors. v. State of U.P.
- 2020 Amish Devgan v. Union of India and Others
- 2024 P.J. Dharmaraj v. Church of South India & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.