Supreme Court of India

Bharti Cellular Limited (now Bharti Airtel Limited) v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 57, Kolkata and Another

Neutral citation
Reported as [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1001
Bench Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti JJ.
Decided 28 February 2024

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the assessees would not be under a legal obligation to deduct tax at source on the income/profit component in the payments received by the distributors/franchisees from the third parties/customers, or while selling/transferring the pre-paid coupons or starter-kits to the distributors.

Judgment, page 38

From the headnote

Issue for Consideration The liability to deduct tax at source u/s.194- , Income Tax Act, 1961 on the amount which, as per the Revenue, is a commission payable to an agent by the assessees-cellular mobile telephone service providers under the franchise/distributorship agreement between the assessees and the franchisees/distributors. Headnotes Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.194- – When not attracted – Assessees entered into franchise or distribution agreements and sold start-up kits, recharge vouchers at a discounted price to the franchisee/distributors – As per Revenue, the difference between

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.