Supreme Court of India
Ranjan Kumar Chadha v. State of Himachal Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issues for consideration : The contention raised was that the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of off ence punishabl e under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not complied with. It was contended that the High Court committed error in recording the fi nding that Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not applicable in the present case as the recovery of the contraband substance was not made as a result of the personal search of the accused but on account of the search of his bag. The issue was whether
Authorities it was built on
- 1999 The State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
- 2002 Padmasundara Rao (dead) and Ors. v. State of T.N. and Ors.
- 2005 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar
- 2010 Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat
- 1965 The Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North
- 1976 D.R. Venkatachalam & Ors. v. Dy. Transport Commissioner & Others
- 1989 Union of India and Ors v. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vasco De Gama
- 2000 Rishabh Agro Industries Ltd. v. P.N.B. Capital Services Ltd.
- 2022 Dayalu Kashyap v. The State of Chhattisgarh
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.