Supreme Court of India

State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand & Anr.

Neutral citation

Reported as [2014] 3 S.C.R. 522

Bench Ranjana Prakash Desai and Madan B. Lokur JJ.

Decided 28 February 2014

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985: s. 50 - Non-compliance of - Respondents-accused caught carrying opium which was recovered from the bag in the hands of one of them - Respondents given a written common notice 0 that they had a right to be searched before a nearest Gazetted Officer, or a Magistrate or before the Superintendent of raiding party - One of them signed for both agreeing to be searched by the Superintendent - Held: Bag of one of the respondents was searched and opium was recovered - His personal search · was also carried out - Personal search of other respondent

Authorities it was built on

1999 The State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh cited by 27
2005 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar cited by 13
2006 Dilip and Anr. v. State of M.P. cited by 4
1999 Kalem Tumba v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. cited by 1

Where later benches applied it

2022 Dayalu Kashyap v. The State of Chhattisgarh referred to
2018 S. K. Raju @ Abdul Haque @ Jagga v. State of West Bengal referred to

Of those, 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.