Supreme Court of India

Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences & Anr. v. Bikartan Das & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2023] 11 S.C.R. 731
Bench Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and J.B. Pardiwala JJ.
Decided 16 August 2023

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid discussion, we have reach ed to the conclusion that the impugned order passed by the Hig h Court is not sustainable in law and the same deserves to be set aside.

Judgment, page 57

From the headnote

Issue for consideration: High Court, if erred in setting aside the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal and holding that respondent No.1 was entitled to the benefi t of enhancement of retirement age from 60 to 65 years as applicable to the AYUSH doctors working under the Ministry of AYUSH. Service Law – Grant of benefi t of enhancement of retirement age – Unsustainability: Held: Respondent No.1 was appointed as a Research Assistant by the appellant-Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences ( CCRAS) and was functioning as a Researcher under the Research Council and his

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.