Supreme Court of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh v. Krishan Bhandari
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law : Union Territory of Chandigarh Employees Rules, 1966: Rule 2 Second proviso. Equal pay for equal work-Science Supervisor in the Institute of Education, Union Territory-Pay scale of-Lower than that of District Science Supervisor in State prior to pay revision notification-Parity in pay scale-Held: not entitled to same pay scale as given to District Science Supervisor as second proviso to R.2 did not apply to such a case. Equal pay for equal work-Equivalence of two posts for purpose of-Held: Onus to prove lay on employee not on employer. Equal pay for equal work-Equivalence of two
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 T.M. Sampath & Ors. v. Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources & Ors.
- 2023 Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences & Anr. v. Bikartan Das & Ors.
- 1997 Associate Banks Officers Association v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.