Supreme Court of India
Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: Appellant was arrested on the fourth supplementary complaint fi led u/ss.44, 45, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in continuation of three complaints in the Complaint Case, for the commission of the off ence of money laundering. High Court whether justifi ed in dismissing the bail application of the appellant seeking bail in connection with the said Complaint Case bearing ECIR No. arising out of the FIR registered for off ence u/s.13(2) r/w 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and u/s.120B r/w ss.420, 465, 467, 468, 471, IPC. Prevention of Money
Authorities it was built on
- 2013 Nimmagadda Prasad v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2009 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Sheetla Sahai & Ors.
- 1987 State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal & Anr.
- 2015 Gautam Kundu v. Manoj Kumar Assistant Director, Eastern Region, Directorate of Enforcement(prevention of Money Laundering Act) Govt. of India
- 2017 Rohit Tandon v. The Enforcement Directorate
- 2017 The State of Bihar & Anr. v. Amit Kumar @ Bachcha Ral
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.