Supreme Court of India
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Sheetla Sahai & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: Section 197 - Sanction for prosecution - Whether public servants act in their official capacity or purport to act in their official capacity such action would attract the provisions of Section 197 - Thus sanction for prosecution was required to be obtained - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13, 19. In this appeal on the basis of the facts of the case and contentions raised on both sides, the main question that arose for consideration was whether sanction for prosecution in terms of Section 197 Cr.P. . was required to be obtained. Dismissing the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Amal Kumar J Ha v. State of Chhatisgarh & Anr.
- 2012 General Officer Commanding v. Cbi and Anr
- 2015 Prof. N. K. Ganguly v. Cbi New Delhi
- 2013 Gulam Sarbar v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
- 2012 N.V. Subba Rao v. State, through Inspector of Police, Cbi/spe,visakhapatnam, A.P.
- 2023 Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
- 2017 State Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police v. K. N. Nehru Etc.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished · 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.