Supreme Court of India
Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the sanction in terms of Section 196 of the Code was valid and proper.
Judgment, page 53
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss.121 and 121 – Conspiracy to commit offences punishable by s.121 – Prosecution case tha t the Investigating Officer, while investigating incident of shoot-out occurred at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, c ame to know about a larger conspiracy concerning Lasker-e-Toiba (LeT), banned militant organization in India – Registration of FIR that accused persons -1 to -6, active members of LeT entered into a cr iminal conspiracy to cause large scale destruction of public p roperty, multi- national companies, places of worships, by causing bomb explosions, attacks on
Authorities it was built on
- 2005 State (n.c.t. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@afsan Guru
- 2010 C. Muniappan & Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2006 Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb and Ors. v. State of U.P.
- 2003 Nazir Khan and Ors. v. State of Delhi
- 1993 Ajay Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors
- 2001 Lal Singh Etc. Etc v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- 2011 Yomeshbhai Pranshankar Bhatt v. State of Gujarat
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.