Supreme Court of India

The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 19 S.C.R. 620
Bench Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, A. S. Bopanna and J. B. Pardiwala JJ.
Decided 23 November 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above factual narration, it is evident that the HVDC Scheme is an old project and the change in the location of the injection point from Nagothane to Kudus would not lead to the closure of the old project.

Judgment, page 80

From the headnote

Electricity Act, 2003 – ss.61-63, 86, 125, 181 – Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) issued an order granting Adani Electricity Mumbai Infra Limited (AEMIL) the tr ansmission licence to develop the Aarey-Kudus transmission projec t based on High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) technology where tariff was to be determined through the Regulated Tariff Mechan ism (RTM) approach u/s.62 – Order challenged by appellant before Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) – Appeal dismissed by APTEL – Held: Provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 do not prescribe one dominant method to

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.