Supreme Court of India
Govindaraju v. Mariamman
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the questions of law framed at the time of admission of the appeal were not questions of substance arising from the findings recorded by the courts of fact.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Hindu Succession Act, 1955; Sections 15(/)(b) and 15(2)(b): Property in dispute allegedly purchased by appellant and respondent from different persons-legal heirs-Suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by one of the vendees-Dismissed by Trial Court holding that both the parties failed to prove the title of their respective vendors in the suit property-Affirmed by first Appellate Court-Reversed by High Court holding that the Vendor/respondent had conveyable title to the suit property since the property was inherited by him as the only legal heir of the deceased owner/
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 M/s. Dsr Steel (p) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
- 2022 The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors.
- 2016 Union of India & Ors. v. Diler Singh
- 2012 Vishwanath S/o Sitaram Agrawal v. Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.