Supreme Court of India
Neeraj Garg v. Sarita Rani and Ors. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that the offending remarks recorded by the learned judge against the appellant should not have been recorded in the manner it was done.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Expunction of remarks: Remarks made against counsel in judgments in which he was representing one of the parties – Judicial propriety – Held: The offending comments recorded i n the High Court judgments were apparently made based on the p ersonal perception of the Judge – Before recording the adverse comments, counsel was not given any opportunity to put forth his explanat ion – Such condemnation of the counsel, without giving him an opportunity of being heard would be a negation of th e principles of audi alteram partem – The requisite degree of re straint and sobriety expected in such
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.