Supreme Court of India
A.M. Mathur v. Pramod Kumar Gupta
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
c Practice and Procedure: Judicial restraint-Need for-High Court Judge making derogatory remarks criticising counsel, parties or witnesses-Such remark not to be made unless absolutely necessary for deciding the case. While allowing a writ petition, one of the Judges delivered the main Judgment invalidating the decision of the Government on the ground that it violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The other Judge delivered a separate, but concurring opinion which contained highly disparaging remarks attributing ma/a fides and underhand dealing on the part of the State Government. Several
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Neeraj Garg v. Sarita Rani and Ors. Etc.
- 2015 State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Anil Kumar Sharma and Another,
- 2014 Om Prakash Chautala v. Kanwar Bhan and Others
- 2012 Amar Pal Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- 2023 State of Punjab and Anr. v. M/s. Shikha Trading Co.
- 2021 Chief Election Commissioner of India v. M.r Vijayabhaskar & Ors.
- 2013 State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Honble Mr. Justice R. A. Mehta (retd) & Ors.
Of those, 4 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.