Supreme Court of India
Tata Motors Ltd. v. Antonio Paulo Vaz and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Consumer Protection: Deficiency in service – Purchase of car by complainant fr om the dealer – Refused to take delivery of the car as it w as an old and used one (2009 make) – Dealer refused to deliver ne w car (2011 make) – Consumer complaint – The manufacturer conte sted the complaint taking the plea that it cannot be held liable for the act of dealer as the relationship between the dealer and the manufa cturer was that of principal to principal and not that of agent and pr incipal – Dealer never appeared – District forum held that there was deficiency in service on the part of dealer as
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 M/s Citicorp Finance (india) Limited v. Snehasis Nanda
- 2024 Vaibhav Jain v. Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.