Supreme Court of India
Ilangovan v. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Inspector of Police
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the above reasons that the Trial Court distinguished between the prosecution’s case against the appellant and the co-accused and we see no reason to interfere with the same.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss. 304 (Part II) and 324 – Prosecution u/ss. 302 and 324 – Against four accused – For causing death of one perso n and for causing injuries to two – Trial Court convicted the appella nt-accused u/ss. 302 & 324, while acquitting the other accused – High ourt, in appeal of appellant-accused modified conviction u/s. 302 t o one u/s. 304 (Part II) on the ground that the case fell under Excepti on 4 to s. 300 IPC – Remaining judgment of trial Court was u pheld – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: The evidence agains t the appellant-accused is consistent with the depositions in ourt
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Surendran v. State of Kerela
- 2021 Asha John Divianathan v. Vikram Malhotra & Ors.
- 2021 Ram Vijay Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 2021 February 25, 2021
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.