Supreme Court of India
Jagdish and Another v. The State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 149 and 148 – Involvement of 13 accused i n the offence including two juveniles – Conviction of thr ee accused by trial court – High Court acquitted one of the accused while upholding the conviction of the two accused (appellants) – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: In view of the previous animosity betwe en the parties and the relationship between sole eye-witness (PW1) and the deceased false implication cannot be ruled out – Sus ceptibility of number and nature of injuries are improbable in the facts of the case – High Court has wrongly considered PW-8 to b e an
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.