Supreme Court of India
Anss Rajashekar v. Augustus Jeba Ananth
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that having regard to the law laid down by the three Judge Bench in Ranga ppa (supra) the appellant duly rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Act.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – ss.138 and 139 – Dishonour of cheque – Appeal against conviction – ppellant’s plea was that there was an absence of legally enforceable debt and the burden which was cast by the provisions of s.139 was dis charged by him – Complainant’s case was that the appellant had taken a loan of Rs.15 lakhs from him and the cheques were i ssued by appellant in discharge of the same – The defence of t he appellant was that he did not borrow the said amount as alleged nor did he issue the cheque in discharge of any legally enforc eable debt and that four blank cheques
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.