Supreme Court of India

Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 9 S.C.R. 164
Bench Dipak Misra, A. M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud JJ.
Decided 21 March 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that E.A. No.329 of 2015 and EA No.330 of 2015, both filed by respondent No.1 in the subject election petition, deserve to be rejected.

Judgment, page 40

From the headnote

Representation of People Act, 1951 – ss. 83 and 100 (1)(a) and (d)(i), 101 and 125A(i) – Appellant challenged the election of respondent no.1 by filing election petition before t he High Court alleging that respondent no.1 had grossly violated several instructions issued by the Election Commission and also the provisions of the Representation of People Act – Res pondent no.1, in turn, filed two applications and sought to strike out pa ragraphs 2 & 9 to 11 of the election petition u/Or. VI, r.16 and to dismiss the election petition in limine u/Or. VII, r.11, both of whic h were allowed by the

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.