Supreme Court of India

L.R. Shivaramagowda Etc. v. T.M. Chandrashekar (d) by Lrs. and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1998] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 241
Bench Dr. A.S. Anand, B.N. Kirpal and M. Srinivasan JJ.
Decided 1 December 1998

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

12 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the reasons aforesaid I hold that the petitioner has G proved that true and correct account or expenditure incurred or authorised was not maintained by respondent-I which amounts to corrupt practice and for that reason his election deserves to be voided.

Judgment, page 12

From the headnote

Representation of the People Act, 1951. Ss. 77(1) and (2), 110(1), 123(6)-Legislative Assembly Election­ Corrupt practice-Election petition-Pleadings- "Material facts" and "Material particulars"-Dijference between-Absence of material facts in petition-Effect of-Election of returned candidate challenged for non-filing of correct and true accounts of election expenses-No a/legation of incurring expenses over and above prescribed limit-Held, essential requirement under S.123(6) is that result of election insofar as it concerns the returned candidate has been materially affected-Failure on part

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.