Supreme Court of India

State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary v. State of T. N. by its Chief Secretary [dipak Misra, Cji] 829 the State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretarystate of Tamil Nadu by its Chief Secretary & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 5 S.C.R. 829
Bench Dipak Misra, Amita V A Roy and A.M. Khanwilkar JJ.
Decided 16 February 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above, we are constrained to observe that the approach of the Tribunal cannot be approved in the facts and circumstances indicated hereinabove.

Judgment, page 284

From the headnote

Inter-State Water Disputes: Water dispute raised by State of Tamil Nadu – Agains t State of Karnataka – Alleging that the executive action taken by State of Karnataka in constructing Kabini, Hemavathi, Harangi, Swrnavath i and other projects has affected the interest of the State of Tamil Nadu in the waters of Cauvery, an inter-State river – Als o alleged that the executive action were in violation of agre ements entered into between the erstwhile Madras Presidency and State o f Mysore in the years 1892 and 1924 – Central Government ref erred the dispute to Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal –

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.